America’s Next War: Building Sustainability in a Throwaway Country
December 4, 2009 by hkaplanmIn a time of economic crisis, a plan has been outlined to save the American economy, while simultaneously saving our planet. With awareness for the need of sustainability at all-time highs, alternative energy, and sustainability in land development can help America out of its economic recession and become “green” in the process. This should begin by creating a new “green” job market for unemployed American workers. The idea for these “green” jobs is credited to President Barack Obama. Obama’s Green Job Initiative was first introduced in 2008 during his presidential campaign; suggesting that he would create 2.5 million jobs, focusing in “green” fields and has since risen to create over 5 million “green” jobs. This initiative has impeccable timing, as American unemployment has reached record highs. However, the cost of pouring our scarce financial resources into these “green” fields, rather than improving current ones could potentially harm our current job market. Although the risk is great, if we could successfully create a new sector of “green” jobs, both the economy and the environment could improve dramatically. This debate begs the question; should America invest in this new sector of “green” jobs, enhancing its long-term sustainability while creating millions of new jobs, given the risk of costing a greater number of jobs than it may create? Yes, America has a responsibility to sustain itself both economically and environmentally, and beyond that, after years of our resources being wasted, resources are beginning to dwindle, which means jobs might not be the only thing that is lost if America does not step up and take the need for sustainability seriously by creating jobs centered around sustainable practices as well as alternative energy solutions.
While Congress debates over how involved to be with “green” jobs, all across America, programs are advancing based around sustainable practices. In Eugene, Oregon, the University of Oregon Campus-Recycling Program has created the UO Sustainability Coalition, which is comprised of 15 groups on the UO campus devoted to sustainable practices. The example of a college having a program like this one is paramount to the “green” movement, as it shows youth culture becoming involved. The program is heavily geared toward student involvement, which has been a key in this movement. Also in Oregon are sustainable developer, Peter Wilcox and the Superfund Manager of the Port of Portland, Jim McKenna. Wilcox plans to begin a project with the city of Milwaukee to create a “green” river transit system from Portland to Milwaukee soon, creating solid alternatives to driving for commuters. McKenna’s “Port of Portland Board of Commissioners recently adopted a new Environmental Policy that incorporates ‘sustainability,’ and we are developing a Sustainability Policy that will require sustainable elements into all our planning, construction, and business activities.” While in Michigan the Department of Energy, Labor & economic Growth, has put together a document called the “Green Jobs Report.” The report outlines background data, as well as the States official “green” policies. The research suggests the state has a vested interest in becoming “greener.”
This desire by states, and programs to become “greener” has come with a great deal of scrutiny from those who believe this effort to become “green,” could easily turn into a disastrous decision for America. When the film An Inconvenient Truth was released, viewers found out that the producer, Al Gore had a financial interest in companies associated with “green” energy, they began questioning his motives. These questions were key when judging the susceptibility of presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and John McCain of being influenced by “Big Oil.” Both suggested that alternative energy solutions were an important aspect of economic improvement; people questioned the politics behind their solution. With Obama attempting to appease his younger generation of voters by “going green,” one must question if there is a safer solution to solving economic hardship. An opponent to the Green Job Initiative, John Rafuse asks, “If Congress’ climate legislation is going to shift U.S. jobs away from companies that produce carbon-based energy and provide employment opportunities for workers in a new ‘green’ economy, where exactly will these new jobs be created?” Rafuse’s solution to the problem was creating a carbon tax, thus penalizing those who create greenhouse-gas emissions. Kevin Hassett has the same solution, believing that focusing on “green,” will end up costing more jobs than it will create.
Rafuse and Hassett’s solution does not help the environment. Instead, it creates a scapegoat for corporations to pay their way out of polluting the earth, rather than actually helping the environment. In Scotland for example, Minister Jim Wallace stated in 2004 that he would invest £22m to create “green” jobs to make the country become a world leader of renewable energy and the “World leader in marine energy.” This effort by Scotland to turn focus on alternative energy shows that a “greener” way of thinking can benefit a country both economically and environmentally. Scotland’s example is a good precursor for America, although they could have followed the advice of New York Times columnist, Elizabeth M. Fowler, who wrote in 1991 that “going green,” would garner an edge in the work force for years to come. Fowler suggests that back in 1991, that environmental policies could “make or break” companies, and thus both employees and employers should focus on that when building toward the future.
While “going green” probably will not net five million jobs like Obama hopes, in the long run, focusing our resources on “green” will be the best decision America could make. Changing jobs to focus more on sustainability may cause slightly greater economic hardships in the short term, but it improves our outlook in resources, as well as creating a positive impact on the earth. By creating a culture that thinks “green” toward the environment, rather than strictly economically, America will better the economy by changing how its run, creating new sectors of businesses that are run the right way. This will inspire consumers to spend, knowing they are purchasing “green” products that are made domestically, bettering our country and earth, and thus providing an example internationally of how a country should be run, focusing on long-term sustainability, rather than just short-term profits.
While Congress debates over how involved to be with “green” jobs, all across America, programs are advancing based around sustainable practices. In Eugene, Oregon, the University of Oregon Campus-Recycling Program has created the UO Sustainability Coalition, which is comprised of 15 groups on the UO campus devoted to sustainable practices. The example of a college having a program like this one is paramount to the “green” movement, as it shows youth culture becoming involved. The program is heavily geared toward student involvement, which has been a key in this movement. Also in Oregon are sustainable developer, Peter Wilcox and the Superfund Manager of the Port of Portland, Jim McKenna. Wilcox plans to begin a project with the city of Milwaukee to create a “green” river transit system from Portland to Milwaukee soon, creating solid alternatives to driving for commuters. McKenna’s “Port of Portland Board of Commissioners recently adopted a new Environmental Policy that incorporates ‘sustainability,’ and we are developing a Sustainability Policy that will require sustainable elements into all our planning, construction, and business activities.” While in Michigan the Department of Energy, Labor & economic Growth, has put together a document called the “Green Jobs Report.” The report outlines background data, as well as the States official “green” policies. The research suggests the state has a vested interest in becoming “greener.”
This desire by states, and programs to become “greener” has come with a great deal of scrutiny from those who believe this effort to become “green,” could easily turn into a disastrous decision for America. When the film An Inconvenient Truth was released, viewers found out that the producer, Al Gore had a financial interest in companies associated with “green” energy, they began questioning his motives. These questions were key when judging the susceptibility of presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and John McCain of being influenced by “Big Oil.” Both suggested that alternative energy solutions were an important aspect of economic improvement; people questioned the politics behind their solution. With Obama attempting to appease his younger generation of voters by “going green,” one must question if there is a safer solution to solving economic hardship. An opponent to the Green Job Initiative, John Rafuse asks, “If Congress’ climate legislation is going to shift U.S. jobs away from companies that produce carbon-based energy and provide employment opportunities for workers in a new ‘green’ economy, where exactly will these new jobs be created?” Rafuse’s solution to the problem was creating a carbon tax, thus penalizing those who create greenhouse-gas emissions. Kevin Hassett has the same solution, believing that focusing on “green,” will end up costing more jobs than it will create.
Rafuse and Hassett’s solution does not help the environment. Instead, it creates a scapegoat for corporations to pay their way out of polluting the earth, rather than actually helping the environment. In Scotland for example, Minister Jim Wallace stated in 2004 that he would invest £22m to create “green” jobs to make the country become a world leader of renewable energy and the “World leader in marine energy.” This effort by Scotland to turn focus on alternative energy shows that a “greener” way of thinking can benefit a country both economically and environmentally. Scotland’s example is a good precursor for America, although they could have followed the advice of New York Times columnist, Elizabeth M. Fowler, who wrote in 1991 that “going green,” would garner an edge in the work force for years to come. Fowler suggests that back in 1991, that environmental policies could “make or break” companies, and thus both employees and employers should focus on that when building toward the future.
While “going green” probably will not net five million jobs like Obama hopes, in the long run, focusing our resources on “green” will be the best decision America could make. Changing jobs to focus more on sustainability may cause slightly greater economic hardships in the short term, but it improves our outlook in resources, as well as creating a positive impact on the earth. By creating a culture that thinks “green” toward the environment, rather than strictly economically, America will better the economy by changing how its run, creating new sectors of businesses that are run the right way. This will inspire consumers to spend, knowing they are purchasing “green” products that are made domestically, bettering our country and earth, and thus providing an example internationally of how a country should be run, focusing on long-term sustainability, rather than just short-term profits.
Make Your Case: Link Summaries
December 4, 2009 by hkaplanm“Should America invest in this new sector of “green” jobs, enhancing its long-term sustainability while creating millions of new jobs, given the risk of costing a greater number of jobs than it may create?”
1.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/news/economy/jobs_february/index.htm
Chris Isidore, CNNMoney.com senior writer, reports on March 6th, 2009, in “Unemployment hits 25-year high,” that a record number of people are now unemployed in the U.S. CNN is owned by the Turner Broadcasting Network, who’s founder has environmental ties, however, the company reports without a bias. This journalistic report focuses solely on the economic side of unemployment. Isidore’s report highlights the staggering 3.3 million jobs lost in the past six months alone. Additionally it shows that those 3.3 million jobs have caused the highest unemployment rate in over 25 years. This report reminds readers that the job side of the economy is one of the biggest factors in economic failure. The numbers create a staggering impression on anyone who reads them, and because they have occurred at a time when there has been more news than ever about the positive effects of “green” jobs, it has created additional pressure from citizens across the nation, who question why this newly improved job market is not being greater utilized. This type of staggering statistic is important to highlight the importance that a greater emphasis is placed on this market in order to lower unemployment and in turn improve the economy.
2.
http://www.uoregon.edu/~recycle/Factoids.htm
The University of Oregon Campus-Recycling Program is lead by program manager Karyn Kaplan. The program has been around since 1990 and has given over 600 students an opportunity to work with the program. The website can be found through the University of Oregon home page, as the program is run in affiliation with the school. Giving an example in the “What Happens When you Recycle,” area of the site, the facility services director breaks down the details of this, as well as how much energy they are saving by recycling, explaining what happens to each individual type of recyclable good in order to allow students to understand the difference they are making. The home page lists activities and programs of which student involvement is key. It also includes many links to outside sources for how to become more “green,” as well as to the Campus Operations, Growing Sustainability or COGS, which is a newsletter that the organization creates and makes available on their website. This institutional source is invaluable because it shows an example of a school being proactive toward becoming more “green,” by funding an organization, which uses such sustainable practices. The sites tabs list everything someone needs to, or should know about recycling and sustainability.
3.
Wilcox, Peter. Personal Interview. 25 October 2009.
Peter Wilcox is a sustainable developer in the greater Portland area. On October 25th, 2009, he was interviewed in person as a Citizen source about his affiliation to the green movement. Wilcox is a longtime Democrat who referenced a clear bias toward Barack Obama, saying how pleased he was to be done with “eight years of [George] Bush.” Wilcox’s personal connection to the movement as a sustainable developer puts him in support of the movement, as he discussed how his future business is significantly brighter as awareness of the need for sustainability has risen significantly since President Barack Obama took office. In another comment, Wilcox referenced the unfortunate timing of the plan, stating that if the plan had been implemented during a time of economic prosperity, than it would be much more successful, as there would be more free money already in the economy to invest in building a “greener” country, as well as economy. The mention of better timing is an unfortunate truth toward the “green” job plan, but it does allow for economists to look at what caused economic hardship before making such large investments in “green” jobs.
4.
McKenna, Jim. Email Interview. 5 November 2009.
Jim McKenna is the Superfund Program Manager for the Port of Portland. On November 5th, 2009, he responded to a list of emailed interview questions, responding as an institutional interview source, as he wrote on behalf of the Port of Portland. As a stakeholder in the green movement, his bias is in support of “green” jobs as it supports his organization. McKenna stated that the increase of awareness that the green movement has, along with the increased funding, has allowed the Port of Portland to better plan for their long-term future and allows them to be more active in doing so. McKenna’s responses are partially geared toward public relations, never delving too deep into responses, focusing a greater amount of attention on the works that the Port of Portland has and is doing to increase sustainability in their work. The use of McKenna as a source allows me to quote an expert stakeholder on the issue of “green” jobs. Discussing how the Port of Portland is becoming more sustainable daily, and how they recently adopted a new Environmental Policy that incorporates sustainability, McKenna is helping create and develop programs, which will hopefully provide them to a greater number of people.
5.
http://www.michigan.gov/nwlb/0,1607,7-242-49026—,00.html
The Bureau Of Labor Market Information And Strategic Initiatives’ director Richard Waclawek, put together a “Green Jobs report” for in May 2009 which can be found at Michigan.gov. The Bureau is run out of the Department of Energy, Labor & Economic Growth (DELEG) in Michigan. This DELEG’s mission statement is “Promote and ensure Michigan’s Future through education, job training, innovation and collaborative partnerships in service and protection of our customer needs.” The statement suggests that they are determined to improve the current job situation in Michigan. The report highlights the economic potential of the state of Michigan, as well as covering every aspect of “green” jobs including defining it, the connection with the Green Job Initiative, as well as research data, the report combines both Institutional reporting and Academic Research. The report supports building the green movement, giving exact numbers, in which, economic questions are answered. This state data will give solid background for organizing green policies in other states. Additionally, this type of data will provide an example of which other states and organizations can look at when they are researching, as well as viewing it as a template when they make the commitment to becoming “greener.”
6.
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/06/24/big_oil_and_the_war_in_iraq/
The Boston Globe’s Derrick Z. Jackson wrote “Big Oil and the war in Iraq” on June 24, 2008. The Globe is owned by The New York Times Company, which provides an impartial view on news around the world. This Op-Ed piece discusses the susceptibility of presidential candidates, Barack Obama and John McCain being swayed by “Big Oil.” Referencing the war in Iraq’s connection to oil profiteering, as well as the political ties of the former Bush administration with Halliburton, Jackson questions both candidates leadership in pushing the country away from the influence of “Big Oil.” This piece questions the influence on political moves, thus looking beyond the obvious, to find where “the money” comes from. When Jackson makes the connection between the war in Iraq, death, oil, and politics it is important, as it’s an aspect of implementing “green” jobs that is not seen enough. However, given the fact that it promotes sustainability, it thus making the likelihood of repeating our countries endeavors into Iraq much less likely, as we will never be so reliant on foreign oil again. Showing a real life situation, with real deaths involved gives a sense of realism that many American’s have not yet realized is so deeply conjoined with this issue.
7.
http://www.opposingviews.com/articles/opinion-senate-s-green-bill-could-put-americans-in-the-red-r-1256575423
Opposingviews.com writer John Rafuse is a “verified expert” on threats to economic security in America. The website lists Rafuse having no party affiliations, yet the website strongly promotes conservative values while reporting on issues. This suggests a strong party bias toward the Republican point of view. On October 26th, 2009, “Senate’s “Green” Bill Could Put Americans in the Red,” quoted Rafuse writing an op-ed piece, which can only be classified as Citizen, when he stated, “green job creation will not outpace net job loss created by a cap-and-trade scheme.” Rafuse references a cap-and-trade policy, which is meant to reduce carbon emissions while promoting “green” jobs, yet questions changing the policies, as he feels like they will take away from our economy. The questions raised by Rafuse go along with his opinion that every positive step we take toward turning our country more “green,” is actually a step back as it will cripple our economy, and ruin the job market. Making broad statements about policymakers trying to shift jobs away from American’s, Rafuse quotes statement unemployment in California, Nevada, and Michigan, proving valuable when unemployment is discussed as part of the reasoning behind pushing for a new “green” job market.
8.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aFtS2.tI2YLs
This journalistic article was posted October 5th, 2009 on Bloomberg.com with the title “Hand Over Your Job If You Want to Dream in Green.” Bloomberg.com is a conservatively run site. Kevin Hassett has strong Republican ties as well, as he worked as an advisor in 2008 for the presidential campaign of Republican John McCain. Hassett believes that rather than focusing on creating “green” jobs, our government should create a carbon tax in order to penalize those who create greenhouse-gas emissions. Hassett references “estimates” from other countries around the globe, leading him to contest that focusing on “green,” will end up costing more jobs than it will create. Thus contradicting Obama’s plan to lower unemployment. Hassett’s appeal to tax the problem goes along with Rafuse’s piece, and thus gives a clear conservative perspective on the Green Job Initiative. Additionally, the two pieces create the ideal of the conservative scapegoat plan, of which taxation is the only solution they can get behind, despite the fact that it does nothing to improve the environmental well being of America. This provides me with the oppositional side of this issue, while also prompting me to have a clear counter-argument against it.
9.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/4039603.stm
BBC’s journalistic article, “Green jobs to turn economic tide,” is written through the major news publication of the BBC, which states that they are “Independent, impartial, and honest” in sharing news worldwide. The article that is without a specified author, discusses Scotland’s Minister Jim Wallace’s plan to make the country the world leader in marine energy. The BBC shows Scotland’s efforts as an example of sustainable practices, but quotes a few who question the idea. One conservative spokesman, Murdo Fraser, worries that other jobs will be lost as a result of people believing “green” jobs to morally superior, while others who opposed the idea actually worried about its effect on the environment. This attempt by Scotland is used as an example of a country that has found a way to create energy without the use of oil, and is thus putting sustainability at the forefront of their thinking in order to turn their own economy around. This is a good example of a nation taking action to find alternatives to being reliant on other countries, while building a greater job market in the process, which is something that is extremely important if America is to follow through with its plan to become more “green.”
10.
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/07/business/careers-mba-s-told-to-look-into-green-jobs.html
The New York Times article “CAREERS; M.B.A.’s Told To Look Into ‘Green’ Jobs,” by Elizabeth M. Fowler on May 7th, 1991, is the first journalistic article written about the idea that “green” jobs is the future. The realization that environmental issues will arise is discussed as Fowler suggests that in order to optimize success, students should look into “green” fields. She suggests that the field has a bright future. The report references Fortune 500 company Proctor & Gamble, specifically hiring someone due to their environmental background. This report quotes Susan Cohn, then assistant placement officer at NYU, who cites the need to “Go green,” stating that environmental policy “can make or break a company.” Given how ahead of its time this 1991 article was about “green” jobs, the story is an example of why our country as a whole needs to build our “green” sectors in the job market now. As the issue was something to look into for the future eighteen years ago, and it turned into a problem, this article suggests that being proactive about doing as much as is possible to build the “green” sectors now, can do nothing but help our country, our job market, as well as our economy.
1.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/news/economy/jobs_february/index.htm
Chris Isidore, CNNMoney.com senior writer, reports on March 6th, 2009, in “Unemployment hits 25-year high,” that a record number of people are now unemployed in the U.S. CNN is owned by the Turner Broadcasting Network, who’s founder has environmental ties, however, the company reports without a bias. This journalistic report focuses solely on the economic side of unemployment. Isidore’s report highlights the staggering 3.3 million jobs lost in the past six months alone. Additionally it shows that those 3.3 million jobs have caused the highest unemployment rate in over 25 years. This report reminds readers that the job side of the economy is one of the biggest factors in economic failure. The numbers create a staggering impression on anyone who reads them, and because they have occurred at a time when there has been more news than ever about the positive effects of “green” jobs, it has created additional pressure from citizens across the nation, who question why this newly improved job market is not being greater utilized. This type of staggering statistic is important to highlight the importance that a greater emphasis is placed on this market in order to lower unemployment and in turn improve the economy.
2.
http://www.uoregon.edu/~recycle/Factoids.htm
The University of Oregon Campus-Recycling Program is lead by program manager Karyn Kaplan. The program has been around since 1990 and has given over 600 students an opportunity to work with the program. The website can be found through the University of Oregon home page, as the program is run in affiliation with the school. Giving an example in the “What Happens When you Recycle,” area of the site, the facility services director breaks down the details of this, as well as how much energy they are saving by recycling, explaining what happens to each individual type of recyclable good in order to allow students to understand the difference they are making. The home page lists activities and programs of which student involvement is key. It also includes many links to outside sources for how to become more “green,” as well as to the Campus Operations, Growing Sustainability or COGS, which is a newsletter that the organization creates and makes available on their website. This institutional source is invaluable because it shows an example of a school being proactive toward becoming more “green,” by funding an organization, which uses such sustainable practices. The sites tabs list everything someone needs to, or should know about recycling and sustainability.
3.
Wilcox, Peter. Personal Interview. 25 October 2009.
Peter Wilcox is a sustainable developer in the greater Portland area. On October 25th, 2009, he was interviewed in person as a Citizen source about his affiliation to the green movement. Wilcox is a longtime Democrat who referenced a clear bias toward Barack Obama, saying how pleased he was to be done with “eight years of [George] Bush.” Wilcox’s personal connection to the movement as a sustainable developer puts him in support of the movement, as he discussed how his future business is significantly brighter as awareness of the need for sustainability has risen significantly since President Barack Obama took office. In another comment, Wilcox referenced the unfortunate timing of the plan, stating that if the plan had been implemented during a time of economic prosperity, than it would be much more successful, as there would be more free money already in the economy to invest in building a “greener” country, as well as economy. The mention of better timing is an unfortunate truth toward the “green” job plan, but it does allow for economists to look at what caused economic hardship before making such large investments in “green” jobs.
4.
McKenna, Jim. Email Interview. 5 November 2009.
Jim McKenna is the Superfund Program Manager for the Port of Portland. On November 5th, 2009, he responded to a list of emailed interview questions, responding as an institutional interview source, as he wrote on behalf of the Port of Portland. As a stakeholder in the green movement, his bias is in support of “green” jobs as it supports his organization. McKenna stated that the increase of awareness that the green movement has, along with the increased funding, has allowed the Port of Portland to better plan for their long-term future and allows them to be more active in doing so. McKenna’s responses are partially geared toward public relations, never delving too deep into responses, focusing a greater amount of attention on the works that the Port of Portland has and is doing to increase sustainability in their work. The use of McKenna as a source allows me to quote an expert stakeholder on the issue of “green” jobs. Discussing how the Port of Portland is becoming more sustainable daily, and how they recently adopted a new Environmental Policy that incorporates sustainability, McKenna is helping create and develop programs, which will hopefully provide them to a greater number of people.
5.
http://www.michigan.gov/nwlb/0,1607,7-242-49026—,00.html
The Bureau Of Labor Market Information And Strategic Initiatives’ director Richard Waclawek, put together a “Green Jobs report” for in May 2009 which can be found at Michigan.gov. The Bureau is run out of the Department of Energy, Labor & Economic Growth (DELEG) in Michigan. This DELEG’s mission statement is “Promote and ensure Michigan’s Future through education, job training, innovation and collaborative partnerships in service and protection of our customer needs.” The statement suggests that they are determined to improve the current job situation in Michigan. The report highlights the economic potential of the state of Michigan, as well as covering every aspect of “green” jobs including defining it, the connection with the Green Job Initiative, as well as research data, the report combines both Institutional reporting and Academic Research. The report supports building the green movement, giving exact numbers, in which, economic questions are answered. This state data will give solid background for organizing green policies in other states. Additionally, this type of data will provide an example of which other states and organizations can look at when they are researching, as well as viewing it as a template when they make the commitment to becoming “greener.”
6.
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/06/24/big_oil_and_the_war_in_iraq/
The Boston Globe’s Derrick Z. Jackson wrote “Big Oil and the war in Iraq” on June 24, 2008. The Globe is owned by The New York Times Company, which provides an impartial view on news around the world. This Op-Ed piece discusses the susceptibility of presidential candidates, Barack Obama and John McCain being swayed by “Big Oil.” Referencing the war in Iraq’s connection to oil profiteering, as well as the political ties of the former Bush administration with Halliburton, Jackson questions both candidates leadership in pushing the country away from the influence of “Big Oil.” This piece questions the influence on political moves, thus looking beyond the obvious, to find where “the money” comes from. When Jackson makes the connection between the war in Iraq, death, oil, and politics it is important, as it’s an aspect of implementing “green” jobs that is not seen enough. However, given the fact that it promotes sustainability, it thus making the likelihood of repeating our countries endeavors into Iraq much less likely, as we will never be so reliant on foreign oil again. Showing a real life situation, with real deaths involved gives a sense of realism that many American’s have not yet realized is so deeply conjoined with this issue.
7.
http://www.opposingviews.com/articles/opinion-senate-s-green-bill-could-put-americans-in-the-red-r-1256575423
Opposingviews.com writer John Rafuse is a “verified expert” on threats to economic security in America. The website lists Rafuse having no party affiliations, yet the website strongly promotes conservative values while reporting on issues. This suggests a strong party bias toward the Republican point of view. On October 26th, 2009, “Senate’s “Green” Bill Could Put Americans in the Red,” quoted Rafuse writing an op-ed piece, which can only be classified as Citizen, when he stated, “green job creation will not outpace net job loss created by a cap-and-trade scheme.” Rafuse references a cap-and-trade policy, which is meant to reduce carbon emissions while promoting “green” jobs, yet questions changing the policies, as he feels like they will take away from our economy. The questions raised by Rafuse go along with his opinion that every positive step we take toward turning our country more “green,” is actually a step back as it will cripple our economy, and ruin the job market. Making broad statements about policymakers trying to shift jobs away from American’s, Rafuse quotes statement unemployment in California, Nevada, and Michigan, proving valuable when unemployment is discussed as part of the reasoning behind pushing for a new “green” job market.
8.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aFtS2.tI2YLs
This journalistic article was posted October 5th, 2009 on Bloomberg.com with the title “Hand Over Your Job If You Want to Dream in Green.” Bloomberg.com is a conservatively run site. Kevin Hassett has strong Republican ties as well, as he worked as an advisor in 2008 for the presidential campaign of Republican John McCain. Hassett believes that rather than focusing on creating “green” jobs, our government should create a carbon tax in order to penalize those who create greenhouse-gas emissions. Hassett references “estimates” from other countries around the globe, leading him to contest that focusing on “green,” will end up costing more jobs than it will create. Thus contradicting Obama’s plan to lower unemployment. Hassett’s appeal to tax the problem goes along with Rafuse’s piece, and thus gives a clear conservative perspective on the Green Job Initiative. Additionally, the two pieces create the ideal of the conservative scapegoat plan, of which taxation is the only solution they can get behind, despite the fact that it does nothing to improve the environmental well being of America. This provides me with the oppositional side of this issue, while also prompting me to have a clear counter-argument against it.
9.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/4039603.stm
BBC’s journalistic article, “Green jobs to turn economic tide,” is written through the major news publication of the BBC, which states that they are “Independent, impartial, and honest” in sharing news worldwide. The article that is without a specified author, discusses Scotland’s Minister Jim Wallace’s plan to make the country the world leader in marine energy. The BBC shows Scotland’s efforts as an example of sustainable practices, but quotes a few who question the idea. One conservative spokesman, Murdo Fraser, worries that other jobs will be lost as a result of people believing “green” jobs to morally superior, while others who opposed the idea actually worried about its effect on the environment. This attempt by Scotland is used as an example of a country that has found a way to create energy without the use of oil, and is thus putting sustainability at the forefront of their thinking in order to turn their own economy around. This is a good example of a nation taking action to find alternatives to being reliant on other countries, while building a greater job market in the process, which is something that is extremely important if America is to follow through with its plan to become more “green.”
10.
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/07/business/careers-mba-s-told-to-look-into-green-jobs.html
The New York Times article “CAREERS; M.B.A.’s Told To Look Into ‘Green’ Jobs,” by Elizabeth M. Fowler on May 7th, 1991, is the first journalistic article written about the idea that “green” jobs is the future. The realization that environmental issues will arise is discussed as Fowler suggests that in order to optimize success, students should look into “green” fields. She suggests that the field has a bright future. The report references Fortune 500 company Proctor & Gamble, specifically hiring someone due to their environmental background. This report quotes Susan Cohn, then assistant placement officer at NYU, who cites the need to “Go green,” stating that environmental policy “can make or break a company.” Given how ahead of its time this 1991 article was about “green” jobs, the story is an example of why our country as a whole needs to build our “green” sectors in the job market now. As the issue was something to look into for the future eighteen years ago, and it turned into a problem, this article suggests that being proactive about doing as much as is possible to build the “green” sectors now, can do nothing but help our country, our job market, as well as our economy.
Green Jobs-G1 Ten Links Assignment
November 13, 2009 by hkaplanmG1 Link Assignment-Green Jobs
Question:
Should America continue to invest in an entirely new job market, which will enhance our countries sustainability, despite the risk of greater market failure and costing more jobs than we may gain?
Introduction:
In a time of economic and environmental crisis, a plan has been outlined to save the American economy, while simultaneously saving our planet as well. With awareness for the need of sustainability at an all-time high; taxation of carbon emission, solar energy, alternative fuels, and overall sustainability in land development can lead America out its current economic recession and into a new “Green” America. By no longer being dependent on foreign oil and creating millions of new “Green” jobs for American workers who are currently unemployed in the process, we will help better our nation as well as our planet.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aFtS2.tI2YLs
This journalistic article was posted October 5th, 2009 on Bloomberg.com with the title “Hand Over Your Job If You Want to Dream in Green.” Kevin Hassett has strong Republican ties, as he worked as an advisor for the presidential campaign of John McCain. Hassett believes that rather than focusing on creating green jobs, our government should create a carbon tax in order to penalize those who create greenhouse-gas emissions. Hassett references “estimates” from other countries, leading him to contest that focusing on “green,” will end up costing more jobs than it will create. Thus contradicting Obama’s plan to lower unemployment.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5349809.ece
On December 16th, 2008, Tom Baldwin’s article titled, “Barack Obama looks to green jobs to save the planet and economy: Obama unveils his new environment team,” in a journalistic format for Timesonline.co.uk. Baldwin was The Times Washington correspondent. His article summarizes for the UK public, President-elect Barack Obama’s struggle to get attention brought to his environmental and economic efforts during a time which scandal about his former senate seat, seem to be taking center stage. This article highlights some of the struggle that Obama has had to deal with, while attempting to get his green movement off the ground.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/4039603.stm
BBC’s journalistic article, “Green jobs to turn economic tide,” is written through the major news publication of the BBC, which states that they are “Independent, impartial, and honest” in sharing news worldwide. The article discusses Scotland’s Minister Jim Wallace’s plan to make the country the world leader in marine energy. The BBC shows Scotland’s efforts as an example of sustainable practices, but quotes a conservative spokesman who disagrees with the economic side of it. This attempt by Scotland is used as an example of a country that has put the environment first, while focusing on the economics side as well.
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/07/business/careers-mba-s-told-to-look-into-green-jobs.html
The New York Times article “CAREERS; M.B.A.’s Told To Look Into ‘Green’ Jobs,” by Elizabeth M. Fowler on May 7th, 1991, is the first journalistic article written about the realization that environmental issues will arise and in order to optimize success, students should look into “Green” fields as the future of the field is bright. The report references Fortune 500 company Proctor & Gamble, specifically hiring someone due to their environmental background. This report quotes Susan Cohn, then assistant placement officer at NYU, who cites the need to “Go green,” stating that environmental policy “can make or break a company.”
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/06/24/big_oil_and_the_war_in_iraq/
The Boston Globe’s Derrick Z. Jackson wrote “Big Oil and the war in Iraq” on June 24, 2008. The Globe is owned by The New York Times Company, providing an impartial view of world news. This Op-Ed piece discusses the susceptibility of presidential candidates, Barack Obama and John McCain being swayed by “Big Oil.” Referencing the war in Iraq’s connection to oil profiteering and the political ties with Halliburton, Jackson questions both candidates leadership in pushing the country away from the influence of “Big Oil.” This piece questions the influence on political moves, thus looking beyond the obvious, to find where “the money” comes from.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/news/economy/jobs_february/index.htm
Chris Isidore, CNNMoney.com senior writer, reports on March 6th, 2009, in “Unemployment hits 25-year high,” that a record number of people are now unemployed in the U.S. CNN is owned by the Turner Broadcasting Network, who’s founder has environmental ties, however, the company reports without a bias. This journalistic report focuses solely on the economic side of unemployment, as Isidore highlights the staggering 3.3 million jobs lost in the past six months alone along with the highest unemployment rate in 25 years. This report reminds readers that the job side of the economy is one of the biggest factors in economic failure.
http://www.opposingviews.com/articles/opinion-senate-s-green-bill-could-put-americans-in-the-red-r-1256575423
Opposingviews.com writer John Rafuse is a “verified expert” on threats to economic security in America. The website lists Rafuse having no party affiliations, yet the website strongly promotes conservative values while reporting on issues. On October 26th, 2009, “Senate’s “Green” Bill Could Put Americans in the Red,” quoted Rafuse writing an op-ed piece, which can only be classified as Citizen, when he stated, “green job creation will not outpace net job loss created by a cap-and-trade scheme.” Rafuse references a cap-and-trade policy, which is meant to reduce carbon emissions while promoting green jobs, yet questions changing the policies, as he feels like they will take away from our economy.
http://www.michigan.gov/nwlb/0,1607,7-242-49026—,00.html
The Bureau Of Labor Market Information And Strategic Initiatives’ director Richard Waclawek, put together a Green Jobs report for in May 2009 which can be found at Michigan.gov. The report highlights the economic potential of the state of Michigan, as well as covering every aspect of green jobs including defining it, the connection with the Green Job Initiative, as well as research data, the report combines both Institutional reporting and Academic Research. The report supports building the green movement, giving exact numbers, in which, economic questions are answered. This state data will give solid background for organizing green policies in other states.
Wilcox, Peter. Personal Interview. 25 October 2009.
Peter Wilcox is a sustainable developer in the greater Portland area. On October 25th, 2009, he was interviewed in person as a Citizen source about his affiliation to the green movement. Wilcox is a longtime Democrat who referenced a clear bias toward Barack Obama, saying how pleased he was to be done with “eight years of Bush.” Wilcox’s personal connection to the movement as a sustainable developer puts him in support of the movement, as he discussed how his future business is significantly brighter as awareness of the need for sustainability has risen significantly since President Barack Obama took office.
McKenna, Jim. Email Interview. 5 November 2009.
Jim McKenna is the Superfund Program Manager for the Port of Portland. On November 5th, 2009, he responded to a list of emailed interview questions, responding as an institutional interview source, as he wrote on behalf of the Port of Portland. As a stakeholder in the green movement, his bias is in support of green jobs as it supports his organization. McKenna stated that the increase of awareness that the green movement has, along with the increased funding is allowing the Port of Portland to better plan for the future and allows them to be more active in doing so.
Question:
Should America continue to invest in an entirely new job market, which will enhance our countries sustainability, despite the risk of greater market failure and costing more jobs than we may gain?
Introduction:
In a time of economic and environmental crisis, a plan has been outlined to save the American economy, while simultaneously saving our planet as well. With awareness for the need of sustainability at an all-time high; taxation of carbon emission, solar energy, alternative fuels, and overall sustainability in land development can lead America out its current economic recession and into a new “Green” America. By no longer being dependent on foreign oil and creating millions of new “Green” jobs for American workers who are currently unemployed in the process, we will help better our nation as well as our planet.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aFtS2.tI2YLs
This journalistic article was posted October 5th, 2009 on Bloomberg.com with the title “Hand Over Your Job If You Want to Dream in Green.” Kevin Hassett has strong Republican ties, as he worked as an advisor for the presidential campaign of John McCain. Hassett believes that rather than focusing on creating green jobs, our government should create a carbon tax in order to penalize those who create greenhouse-gas emissions. Hassett references “estimates” from other countries, leading him to contest that focusing on “green,” will end up costing more jobs than it will create. Thus contradicting Obama’s plan to lower unemployment.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5349809.ece
On December 16th, 2008, Tom Baldwin’s article titled, “Barack Obama looks to green jobs to save the planet and economy: Obama unveils his new environment team,” in a journalistic format for Timesonline.co.uk. Baldwin was The Times Washington correspondent. His article summarizes for the UK public, President-elect Barack Obama’s struggle to get attention brought to his environmental and economic efforts during a time which scandal about his former senate seat, seem to be taking center stage. This article highlights some of the struggle that Obama has had to deal with, while attempting to get his green movement off the ground.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/4039603.stm
BBC’s journalistic article, “Green jobs to turn economic tide,” is written through the major news publication of the BBC, which states that they are “Independent, impartial, and honest” in sharing news worldwide. The article discusses Scotland’s Minister Jim Wallace’s plan to make the country the world leader in marine energy. The BBC shows Scotland’s efforts as an example of sustainable practices, but quotes a conservative spokesman who disagrees with the economic side of it. This attempt by Scotland is used as an example of a country that has put the environment first, while focusing on the economics side as well.
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/07/business/careers-mba-s-told-to-look-into-green-jobs.html
The New York Times article “CAREERS; M.B.A.’s Told To Look Into ‘Green’ Jobs,” by Elizabeth M. Fowler on May 7th, 1991, is the first journalistic article written about the realization that environmental issues will arise and in order to optimize success, students should look into “Green” fields as the future of the field is bright. The report references Fortune 500 company Proctor & Gamble, specifically hiring someone due to their environmental background. This report quotes Susan Cohn, then assistant placement officer at NYU, who cites the need to “Go green,” stating that environmental policy “can make or break a company.”
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/06/24/big_oil_and_the_war_in_iraq/
The Boston Globe’s Derrick Z. Jackson wrote “Big Oil and the war in Iraq” on June 24, 2008. The Globe is owned by The New York Times Company, providing an impartial view of world news. This Op-Ed piece discusses the susceptibility of presidential candidates, Barack Obama and John McCain being swayed by “Big Oil.” Referencing the war in Iraq’s connection to oil profiteering and the political ties with Halliburton, Jackson questions both candidates leadership in pushing the country away from the influence of “Big Oil.” This piece questions the influence on political moves, thus looking beyond the obvious, to find where “the money” comes from.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/news/economy/jobs_february/index.htm
Chris Isidore, CNNMoney.com senior writer, reports on March 6th, 2009, in “Unemployment hits 25-year high,” that a record number of people are now unemployed in the U.S. CNN is owned by the Turner Broadcasting Network, who’s founder has environmental ties, however, the company reports without a bias. This journalistic report focuses solely on the economic side of unemployment, as Isidore highlights the staggering 3.3 million jobs lost in the past six months alone along with the highest unemployment rate in 25 years. This report reminds readers that the job side of the economy is one of the biggest factors in economic failure.
http://www.opposingviews.com/articles/opinion-senate-s-green-bill-could-put-americans-in-the-red-r-1256575423
Opposingviews.com writer John Rafuse is a “verified expert” on threats to economic security in America. The website lists Rafuse having no party affiliations, yet the website strongly promotes conservative values while reporting on issues. On October 26th, 2009, “Senate’s “Green” Bill Could Put Americans in the Red,” quoted Rafuse writing an op-ed piece, which can only be classified as Citizen, when he stated, “green job creation will not outpace net job loss created by a cap-and-trade scheme.” Rafuse references a cap-and-trade policy, which is meant to reduce carbon emissions while promoting green jobs, yet questions changing the policies, as he feels like they will take away from our economy.
http://www.michigan.gov/nwlb/0,1607,7-242-49026—,00.html
The Bureau Of Labor Market Information And Strategic Initiatives’ director Richard Waclawek, put together a Green Jobs report for in May 2009 which can be found at Michigan.gov. The report highlights the economic potential of the state of Michigan, as well as covering every aspect of green jobs including defining it, the connection with the Green Job Initiative, as well as research data, the report combines both Institutional reporting and Academic Research. The report supports building the green movement, giving exact numbers, in which, economic questions are answered. This state data will give solid background for organizing green policies in other states.
Wilcox, Peter. Personal Interview. 25 October 2009.
Peter Wilcox is a sustainable developer in the greater Portland area. On October 25th, 2009, he was interviewed in person as a Citizen source about his affiliation to the green movement. Wilcox is a longtime Democrat who referenced a clear bias toward Barack Obama, saying how pleased he was to be done with “eight years of Bush.” Wilcox’s personal connection to the movement as a sustainable developer puts him in support of the movement, as he discussed how his future business is significantly brighter as awareness of the need for sustainability has risen significantly since President Barack Obama took office.
McKenna, Jim. Email Interview. 5 November 2009.
Jim McKenna is the Superfund Program Manager for the Port of Portland. On November 5th, 2009, he responded to a list of emailed interview questions, responding as an institutional interview source, as he wrote on behalf of the Port of Portland. As a stakeholder in the green movement, his bias is in support of green jobs as it supports his organization. McKenna stated that the increase of awareness that the green movement has, along with the increased funding is allowing the Port of Portland to better plan for the future and allows them to be more active in doing so.
Visual Analysis Writeups
October 21, 2009 by hkaplanm
Four years ago a Baltimore gas station posted this sign attempting to inform the public that the increase in gas prices was not the stations fault and instead was due to the inevitable gas shortage that the United States was facing. Many news outlets including Baltimore’s WBAL TV 11 reported the story. The image is categorized as citizen as it was a citizens creation and the while the intent of the shot was just to make the customers less upset about prices, the sign ended up serving the community as it provided public awareness to the gas issue. The image resonates today, as the gas crisis is still a major issue. While the gas station owner did profit from the publicity stunt of posting prices as an “Arm” and “Leg,” it was not politically motivated and the overall result of it was simply a joke that raised awareness to a prevalent issue.
RedGreenandBlue.org has an agenda. The agenda is making the public aware of the current energy crisis. This leftist organization is a supporter of President Barack Obama and this photo of him was taken in order to help him during his presidential campaign. Obama is the man behind the issue in terms of support for “Green Jobs.” In this photo, which was posted October 14th, 2008, Obama is explaining to a crowd exactly what it is that “Green Jobs” are. During the speech he promises to create five million of them when he becomes President. Obama is framed in the picture looking confident and presidential as the websites agenda was to make him look so. We care about the journalistic photo of Obama as his connection to the issue because of his promises have been responsible for creating awareness about this issue as well as brightening the outlook on America’s future.
TO BE CONTINUED!!!
October 9, 2009 by hkaplanmIris has a favorite singer. Iris meets her favorite singer. Iris gets a hit song written about her. To be continued.
To write fan fiction is to write a fantasy. In doing so, many fans tend to write about outlandish events occurring. Iris writes about Johnny from the Goo Goo Dolls. However, in writing, she entirely forgets she is writing to anyone but herself. She ignores spelling, grammar, punctuation, spacing, how dialogue is written, and literally has no structure to how she writes. She changes how Johnny’s name is spelled at least two times, as well as entirely ignoring the need for capitalization throughout the text. The biggest issue of this story is that it has no real form. The lack of a conflict or resolution makes the story just a happy glimpse of a false moment in time. Without a conflict, there is no reason for a reader to get invested in the story, and without the narrative structure, it just seems like someone is bragging about an unrealistic event. Additionally, the dialogue sounds about as realistic as the vampires from the “Twilight” series. It is just not real, despite how much 12-25 year-old girls wish it was. When someone writes a piece of fan fiction, no one expects a masterpiece, but this story is outlandishly bad, in the sense that it is actually quite painful to read. The overall lack of structure makes it impossible to gain any type of momentum or flow whatsoever.
To write fan fiction is to write a fantasy. In doing so, many fans tend to write about outlandish events occurring. Iris writes about Johnny from the Goo Goo Dolls. However, in writing, she entirely forgets she is writing to anyone but herself. She ignores spelling, grammar, punctuation, spacing, how dialogue is written, and literally has no structure to how she writes. She changes how Johnny’s name is spelled at least two times, as well as entirely ignoring the need for capitalization throughout the text. The biggest issue of this story is that it has no real form. The lack of a conflict or resolution makes the story just a happy glimpse of a false moment in time. Without a conflict, there is no reason for a reader to get invested in the story, and without the narrative structure, it just seems like someone is bragging about an unrealistic event. Additionally, the dialogue sounds about as realistic as the vampires from the “Twilight” series. It is just not real, despite how much 12-25 year-old girls wish it was. When someone writes a piece of fan fiction, no one expects a masterpiece, but this story is outlandishly bad, in the sense that it is actually quite painful to read. The overall lack of structure makes it impossible to gain any type of momentum or flow whatsoever.
Timeline of Green Jobs
October 9, 2009 by hkaplanmGreen Jobs and Why We Need Them Now!
1972-Iraqi government nationalized the oil industry, thus gaining control power over the United States.
1973-Yom Kippur War of 1973, the first oil crisis causing a drastic increase in oil prices.
1991-M.B.A’s are told to look into “Green” work fields to gain advantage. Additionally Proctor & Gamble hires a student partially due to their environmental knowledge.
2002-President Bush claims Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has “Weapons of Mass Destruction.” Thus sparking interest in beginning a war in Iraq.
2004-Scotland’s Minister Jim Wallace states he will invest £22m over the next three years to create “Green” jobs in support to make the country become a world leader of renewable energy and the “World leader in marine energy.”
2005-President Bush gives new reason for Iraq war, citing protection of the oil fields. Bush claims the fields could easily fall under terrorist control, finding it just cause to continue the war.
2007-Former head of the US Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan claims Iraq war was for oil.
2008-Gas prices reach all-time high of $4.086 a gallon.
2008-President-Elect Barack Obama pledges to create at least 2.5 million jobs, focusing on “Green” jobs.
2009-The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act includes in excess of $80 billion in support of clean energy jobs.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/news/economy/jobs_february/index.htm
Given how dreadful the economy is, there has been a greater emphasis on job security. This article highlights that unemployment has reached an all-time high and suggesting that things will get worse in the upcoming months.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122886086448792609.html
Poland and other European leaders have begun to question whether or not “Green Jobs” will really make a solid ecological and economic impact. They state concern over industries such as coal mining being shut down, harming their economy.
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/06/24/big_oil_and_the_war_in_iraq/
This 2008 article shows the connection between the war in Iraq and oil profiteering. Referencing Halliburton and the political ties, they suggest Barack Obama may not be as susceptible as his opponent, John McCain in being swayed by “Big Oil.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aFtS2.tI2YLs
This site offers a balanced view of the two sides to the “Green Jobs” debate. Eventually highlighting the fact that while the economics behind the plan may not be as solid as we originally were told, it can end up reaping enormous benefits for the economy as well as help to clean the environment.
http://denver.yourhub.com/Arvada/Stories/Archive/Education/College/Story~661640.aspx
This is a current story about how Colorado’s RRCC has begun a process of strengthening not only the economy but helping invent a new energy future. RRCC is giving “Community College green jobs certificates and a green jobs guidebook,” this will help the state be an advocate for a changing economic climate.
1972-Iraqi government nationalized the oil industry, thus gaining control power over the United States.
1973-Yom Kippur War of 1973, the first oil crisis causing a drastic increase in oil prices.
1991-M.B.A’s are told to look into “Green” work fields to gain advantage. Additionally Proctor & Gamble hires a student partially due to their environmental knowledge.
2002-President Bush claims Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has “Weapons of Mass Destruction.” Thus sparking interest in beginning a war in Iraq.
2004-Scotland’s Minister Jim Wallace states he will invest £22m over the next three years to create “Green” jobs in support to make the country become a world leader of renewable energy and the “World leader in marine energy.”
2005-President Bush gives new reason for Iraq war, citing protection of the oil fields. Bush claims the fields could easily fall under terrorist control, finding it just cause to continue the war.
2007-Former head of the US Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan claims Iraq war was for oil.
2008-Gas prices reach all-time high of $4.086 a gallon.
2008-President-Elect Barack Obama pledges to create at least 2.5 million jobs, focusing on “Green” jobs.
2009-The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act includes in excess of $80 billion in support of clean energy jobs.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/news/economy/jobs_february/index.htm
Given how dreadful the economy is, there has been a greater emphasis on job security. This article highlights that unemployment has reached an all-time high and suggesting that things will get worse in the upcoming months.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122886086448792609.html
Poland and other European leaders have begun to question whether or not “Green Jobs” will really make a solid ecological and economic impact. They state concern over industries such as coal mining being shut down, harming their economy.
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/06/24/big_oil_and_the_war_in_iraq/
This 2008 article shows the connection between the war in Iraq and oil profiteering. Referencing Halliburton and the political ties, they suggest Barack Obama may not be as susceptible as his opponent, John McCain in being swayed by “Big Oil.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aFtS2.tI2YLs
This site offers a balanced view of the two sides to the “Green Jobs” debate. Eventually highlighting the fact that while the economics behind the plan may not be as solid as we originally were told, it can end up reaping enormous benefits for the economy as well as help to clean the environment.
http://denver.yourhub.com/Arvada/Stories/Archive/Education/College/Story~661640.aspx
This is a current story about how Colorado’s RRCC has begun a process of strengthening not only the economy but helping invent a new energy future. RRCC is giving “Community College green jobs certificates and a green jobs guidebook,” this will help the state be an advocate for a changing economic climate.
Getting Started–Green Jobs
October 2, 2009 by hkaplanmhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/energy_and_environment/
The Green Jobs Initiative is a substantial step in turning away from our countries dependency on foreign oil and wasteful use of resources. “Green Jobs” will not only stimulate our economy by expanding the workforce but additionally make our country be able to be much more self-sufficient. Becoming self-sufficient and a more environmentally friendly country peaks my interest as I have grown up in a household where waste was kept to a minimum and relying on ourselves and each other was put in much higher priority than relying on others. Additionally I was exposed to the realization that if we do not change our habits as a society, eventually our resources will actually run out, which is why I support the Green Jobs Initiative fully and hope that with the $600 million in green job training, real change can occur, making our country a better and more efficient place.
The Green Jobs Initiative is a substantial step in turning away from our countries dependency on foreign oil and wasteful use of resources. “Green Jobs” will not only stimulate our economy by expanding the workforce but additionally make our country be able to be much more self-sufficient. Becoming self-sufficient and a more environmentally friendly country peaks my interest as I have grown up in a household where waste was kept to a minimum and relying on ourselves and each other was put in much higher priority than relying on others. Additionally I was exposed to the realization that if we do not change our habits as a society, eventually our resources will actually run out, which is why I support the Green Jobs Initiative fully and hope that with the $600 million in green job training, real change can occur, making our country a better and more efficient place.
No comments:
Post a Comment